[Cialug] Virtual Box and NAS
Dave Hala Jr
dave at 58ghz.net
Wed Aug 17 21:04:28 CDT 2011
I've decided not to launch the VM database servers from a file server or
NAS, as I wont be able to fund a fiber channel device to get the kind of
performance that I would need for the database servers.
I've still got a need for about 4tb of just general file storage. If I
could outperform a ReadyNas 1500 using hardware that I have laying
around or an considering taking out of service, its worth considering.
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 20:47 -0500, Jon Clemons wrote:
> IMO 4 sata drives aren't going to give much performance for several
> virtual machines especially database servers with lots of io. If your
> going to build your own then look at openfiler.
>
>
> Dave Hala Jr <dave at 58ghz.net> wrote:
>
> I was looking for high performance file server for a reasonable amount
> of money. Consensus is that a home built file server would readily out
> perform most of the NAS boxes in the under $1500.00 range.
>
> On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 17:50 -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> > At 05:45 PM 8/17/2011, you wrote:
> > >So... the question is, if we have a Centos 6 file server, with a
> > >1gbintel nic and a 3ware 8006-4lp sata controller with 4 or so 1.5gb
> > >7200sata drives in a raid 5 configuration, does a dual Pentium III
> > >1.4 ghzmachine with 2gb of ram have enough horsepower for decent performance?
> >
> > Performance at what? X windows, probably not, . . file/print, certainly.
> >
> > Lee
> >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
>
> > Cialug mailing list
> > Cialug at cialug.org
> > http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
>
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
More information about the Cialug
mailing list