[Cialug] Ubuntu 9.04 udate

[Tom Sellers]

Not that I understand the route information but these two are obviously different.

The following is the route information from a working machine.

192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.52
default via 192.168.1.1 dev eth0

This is the route information from the upgraded machine which does not.

192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.55 metric 1
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1000
default via 192.168.1.1 dev eth0 proto static



--- On Sat, 7/4/09, kristau <kristau at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: kristau <kristau at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Cialug] Ubuntu 9.04 udate
> To: "Central Iowa Linux Users Group" <cialug at cialug.org>
> Date: Saturday, July 4, 2009, 11:06 PM
> Odd indeed. That output from
> 'iptables -L' indicates that there are no
> rules in iptables and it should definitely NOT be eating
> pings.
> 
> The next thing to check is our routing tables. Issue the
> following
> command and post the output:
> 
>   ip route
> 
> Check that route vs. the route from your other systems and
> make sure they match.
> 
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Tom Sellers<tomsellers2001 at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I get three statements when I run this
> >
> > Chain Input
> > Chain Forward
> > Chain Output
> >
> > all three state policy Accept.
> >
> > Does this tell you if it is off or on(up or down)?
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>