[Cialug] BtrFS

Shane Nehring shane at ntoast.com
Thu Oct 21 16:20:10 UTC 2021


Yeah, by all measures it's stable with a great feature set for single
device configurations. You just lose a lot of the data integrity features
in such configurations, the same you would with ZFS.

On Thu, Oct 21, 2021, 11:14 L. V. Lammert <lvl at omnitec.net> wrote:

> On Thu, 21 Oct 2021, Theron Conrey wrote:
>
> > The linux kernel team considers it stable. As a ZFS user, I'd love to
> > sayit's not stable, but honestly, it's used at scale effectively in
> > somepretty significant deployments.Having missed the presentation, was
> > there adifferent option/recommendation provided?
> >
> The presentation was focused on feature parity w/ZFS; the links cited also
> show stability *except* for ZFS parity.
>
> Looking forward to more discussion next month!
>
>         Lee
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> https://www.cialug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>


More information about the Cialug mailing list