[Cialug] BtrFS

[Shane Nehring]

https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Status

On Thu, Oct 21, 2021, 11:04 Theron Conrey <theron at conrey.org> wrote:

> anyone have a link to show it as "half baked" or "unfinished"?
>
> The linux kernel team considers it stable. As a ZFS user, I'd love to say
> it's not stable, but honestly, it's used at scale effectively in some
> pretty significant deployments.
> Having missed the presentation, was there a
> different option/recommendation provided?
>
>
> -theron
>
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:54 AM L. V. Lammert <lvl at omnitec.net> wrote:
>
> > The thought distilled in my mind overnight, .. would love to hear
> > responses:
> >
> > We have been using BtrFS for many years for it's invaluable recovery
> > options as a root partition (and as the default root FS for OpenSuSE), ..
> > so I was understanbly confused at the presentation last night classifying
> > it as "unfinished", or even "half baked".
> >
> > So, .. my question is this:
> >
> > Givem that the majority of installations ARE running a single device
> (e.g.
> > SAN, HW RAID, etc.), why would the ability to run multiple devices have
> > anything at all to do with the finish level of the file system??
> >
> > Really seems like a red herring to me, .. dissing a really useful
> > filesystem with negatives that don't even apply?
> >
> >         TIA!
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cialug mailing list
> > Cialug at cialug.org
> > https://www.cialug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cialug
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> https://www.cialug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>