[Cialug] SOT: Local ISPs

Andrew Denner linux-list at upeke.com
Wed Aug 8 17:41:50 UTC 2018


Regrettably I am so close yet so far away from the fiber. In Polk City I
currently have Centurylink dsl but have their fiber running through my
front yard as well as a run from UPN

On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 6:28 PM Rob Cook <rdjcook at gmail.com> wrote:

> If you can get it, CLs fiber to the home is amazing. $80/mo for 1Gig down.
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018, 1:47 PM David Champion <dchamp1337 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The traditional ADSL service in Windsor Heights is pretty bad, due to
> your
> > distance from the CO and relatively old copper lines. I think there are
> > some areas that have Century Link's Fiber to the Node service, which can
> > also cause cross-talk for the old ADSL circuits and reduce your available
> > speed. There probably won't be Fiber to the prem there any time soon.
> >
> > -dc
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 11:28 AM Bill Davis <bill.davis at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I live in Windsor Heights. We had DSL Internet (still do actually, as
> > part
> > > of a bundle with phone service through Aureon) but don't actually use
> it.
> > > We decided to keep it as an inexpensive  backup after switching to
> > Mediacom
> > > for Internet service, since I work from home sometimes and needed much
> > > faster speed.   Our DSL connection is a 3 Mbps connection (reality
> about
> > > 1.5 or less).  We asked about getting faster speeds and they told me
> the
> > > phone lines were too old to support anything faster over one line.  We
> > were
> > > told we'd have to get a second phone line and multiplex the connection
> > (or
> > > whatever the proper net term is).  We'd have paid about $90/moth for 6
> > > Mbps-ish speeds, as I recall (this was several years ago.)  By
> > comparison,
> > > Mediacom had 15 Mbps for half that cost, and faster options were
> > > available.  That 15 Mbps connection was converted about 8 months ago
> to a
> > > 60 Mbps connection with no increase in our cost.  And I happened to
> run a
> > > speed test the other day and it's now actually more like 80 Mbps.
> > >
> > > So I'd go with Mediacom not DSL in Windsor Heights. To be fair, things
> > may
> > > have changed recently; someone from CenturyLink was going door-to-door
> > > about 6-8 months or so ago and said they were upgrading their lines and
> > > speed...but I couldn't get a speed out of him.  I'd check into what
> > > CenturyLink or Aureon can get you, but don't be surprised if it doesn't
> > > compare to Mediacom.   I'm on the LOW end of Mediacom's available
> speeds.
> > > 15 Mbps was plenty for my needs, so I am more than happy with 60-80
> Mbps.
> > > We're also watching a lot more streaming video now that we dropped
> > Mediacom
> > > cable TV service and use them solely for Internet.  Much cheaper to buy
> > the
> > > season of the shows we watch off iTunes and stream them or download
> them.
> > > We figured out that to buy each season of the shows we watch, for ALL
> the
> > > shows, would be just maybe 2-4 months worth of cable TV bills.  AND we
> > own
> > > the show and can watch them again anytime and on any device.   We
> hooked
> > up
> > > an antenna to the TV but really only use it for one or two things that
> > > aren't series TV that we can't get over the 'Net (CBS Sunday Morning,
> > > notably).
> > >
> > > - Bill
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 10:43 AM Nathan C. Smith <NSmith at hhlawpc.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > It seems like the Local ISPs have all gone away with Aureon having
> > > gobbled
> > > > them up. Are there any ISPs left that serve Des Moines?  I’m looking
> > for
> > > > Internet service in the Windsor Heights area for one of my kids.  Any
> > > > thoughts on getting the best deals out of Mediacom?
> > > >
> > > > Thank you.
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > [http://owa.hhlawpc.com/graphics/HHLogo.jpg]<http://www.hhlawpc.com>
> > > > This E-mail (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic
> > > > Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, is confidential
> and
> > > may
> > > > contain attorney-client materials and/or attorney work product,
> legally
> > > > privileged and protected from disclosure.  If you are not the
> intended
> > > > recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination,
> > > > distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
> prohibited.
> > > > Please respond to the sender that you have received the message in
> > error,
> > > > then delete it and destroy any and all copies of it.  If you are a
> > client
> > > > of our firm, this e-mail confirms that communication to you by e-mail
> > is
> > > an
> > > > acceptable way to transmit attorney-client information.  Thank you.
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Cialug mailing list
> > > > Cialug at cialug.org
> > > > http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Cialug mailing list
> > > Cialug at cialug.org
> > > http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cialug mailing list
> > Cialug at cialug.org
> > http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>


More information about the Cialug mailing list