[Cialug] Programming languages: next 10 yrs

[David Champion]

Nah, COBOL is Sumerian, C is Latin.

-dc


On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Andrew Denner <linux-list at upeke.com> wrote:

> COBOL is kinda like Latin, It is an ancient language that should have died
> out years ago but is kept alive by a small priesthood of devoted
> organizations.
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Kyle H <khamil8686 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Nice write up, agreed.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:03 PM Bill Davis <bill.davis at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > No, COBOL is not dead. Don't hold your breath, either.
> > >
> > > We still have COBOL at the State. New development IS occurring. They
> > > actually asked me to help out with it a few years back, as they were
> > > overloaded/short handed and my supervisor recalled seeing it on my
> > resume.
> > > I pointed out that hadn't worked in COBOL since maybe 1985. They were
> ok
> > > with that.  It actually came back fairly well. Even remembered at bit
> of
> > > JCL.
> > >
> > > And a web site I maintain talks to a mainframe-based web service
> written
> > > in COBOL that pull data off the mainframe database. I took over
> > maintenance
> > > of the COBOL web service side, too, a while back when the developer
> > left. I
> > > originally just did the Java-side (JSP) work for the web site.  Neither
> > > side is needing too many changes at this point.
> > >
> > > Lots of other languages are in use here too. I've done a bit of
> > Ruby/Rails
> > > some years ago, a bit of VBA still crops up now and again (so far some
> in
> > > Excel, some in Word and some in Outlook.) I know C# and other .Net
> > > languages, PHP, etc get used at the state, and my group uses Java JSF
> > (but
> > > not me, yet).
> > >
> > > Flexibility and breadth of knowledge are important!  Code lasts
> forever.
> > > Or at least it is very wise to assume so.
> > >
> > >  - Bill
> > >
> > > > On Apr 28, 2017, at 11:29 AM, Daniel A. Ramaley <
> > > daniel.ramaley at drake.edu> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On 2017-04-28 10:28, David Champion wrote:
> > > >> Is COBOL dead yet?
> > > >
> > > > We still have some COBOL running here. Thankfully, maintaining it is
> > not
> > > > my problem. New stuff isn't being developed in it.
> > > >
> > > > Still have some Fortran too, though the new development in that
> > language
> > > > is pretty much limited to the physics faculty at this point.
> > > >
> > > > __
> > > > Daniel Ramaley | Server Engineer 2
> > > > Information Technology Services | Drake University
> > > > T: +1-515-271-4540
> > > > W: http://its.drake.edu/
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Cialug mailing list
> > > > Cialug at cialug.org
> > > > http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Cialug mailing list
> > > Cialug at cialug.org
> > > http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cialug mailing list
> > Cialug at cialug.org
> > http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>