[Cialug] Landscape of SQL servers

[Dave Hala]

I think you really need to put that question in context.  Lots of
different folks on this list working in very different environments.
The trend, at least from my perspective, is moving towards most
applications having their own database, with an API that other
applications ( also with their own database) talk to.

I'm not seeing corruption as a function of a large scale database. In
fact, I see more problems with the smaller applications.

:) Dave

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Kyle Hamilton <khamil8686 at gmail.com> wrote:
>   Per my viewpoint, things seem to be transitioning to every application
> having it's own little database, or every few apps sharing one database. The
> smaller database seems good for avoiding corruption, and it is just easier
> to just throw one up for use. This is opposed to every application sharing a
> single, massive database.
>
>   What about backups? Is there a good software to backup an IT landscape
> full of multiple databases? Am I correct that things seem to be
> transitioning into every application having their own database? I welcome
> anyones opinions and suggestions.
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Kyle
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug