[Cialug] ? Team Code Review Tool like Atlassian Stash
Claus Niesen
cniesen at gmx.net
Tue Jun 28 10:32:27 CDT 2016
I'm curious why businesses would consider maintaining their own installation considering hosted Jira & Bitbucket only cost $3,600/year for 50 users.
Right now I'm in the situation where I'm trying to motivate a development shop to adapt a Bitbucket, Artifactory, Jenkins (or similar) environment. I still don't have a clue what to suggest for Jenkins (hosted vs self-hosting). My only dev team experiences have been with self-hosted Jenkins and the upkeep of that server does seem to get overly involved over the long term.
Gesendet: Montag, 27. Juni 2016 um 14:50 Uhr
Von: "David Michael" <1.david.michael at gmail.com>
An: "Central Iowa Linux Users Group" <cialug at cialug.org>
Betreff: Re: [Cialug] ? Team Code Review Tool like Atlassian Stash
I have used gerrit for code reviews before, it is kind of clunky but it
works. https://www.gerritcodereview.com/
That said, we are moving away from it to some Atlassian tools. :)
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 2:46 PM, jim kraai <jimgkraai at gmail.com> wrote:
> We're using git internally and it has been decided that we won't be buying
> the Atlassian suite.
>
> What are people using to track code reviews?
>
> https://www.reviewboard.org/[https://www.reviewboard.org/] looks like a winner on all categories, anyone
> tried it or run into problems?
>
> Thanks!
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug[http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug]
>
--
David Michael
_______________________________________________
Cialug mailing list
Cialug at cialug.org
http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug[http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug]
More information about the Cialug
mailing list