[Cialug] Monitoring?

[David Champion]

The web site for FAN is:

http://www.fullyautomatednagios.org/

It also works with Centreon (optional)

http://www.centreon.com/

-dc

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Jeff Chapin <chapinjeff at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'd second Icinga. In addition to fixing many of the irritating Nagios
> bugs, it is not affiliated with the 'hostile takeover' of
> nagios-plugins: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054340
>
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 3:42 PM, David Michael
> <1.david.michael at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Zabbix isn't a bad solution. It has its quirks but I like it better than
> > nagios.
> > On Jan 25, 2015 3:25 PM, "David Champion" <dchamp1337 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Check out FAN. I like it better than adagios.
> >> -dc
> >> On Jan 25, 2015 3:12 PM, "David Bierce" <david at bierce.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > That is pretty much the state of things.  Here is a little experience
> >> from
> >> > the solutions I've used.  In no particular order and from a phone.
> >> >
> >> > Nagios is a fantastic complex crontab that runs 100s of shell scripts
> and
> >> > returns its little amounts of data at amazing speeds, until you try to
> >> > scale it.  If you were thinking of using Nagios,
> https://www.icinga.org/
> >> > is
> >> > a compelling fork and has 20% less suck in the current version.
> >> >
> >> > http://sensuapp.org/ looks to be promising, just added support and
> >> > integration for it into our products at work.  At the end of the day,
> it
> >> > isn't much different than nagios, except it allows you to scale a bit
> >> > better and lets you pipe the data and events between processes much
> >> > easier.  It even lets you run Nagios checks...because like
> nagios...its a
> >> > scaled cron.  Does have a few canned solutions for feeding metrics to
> >> > graphite.
> >> >
> >> > opennms.org is a compelling solution, for network and network device
> >> > monitoring only.  It falls flat on monitoring non network things.
> >> >
> >> > Zenoss, is easy to use and and has a webinterface, but it quite
> bloated
> >> and
> >> > not very fast at performing checks at scale.  For small environments
> it
> >> is
> >> > quite easy.
> >> >
> >> > For Paid solutions
> >> >
> >> > If you're an all microsoft shop, System Center is quite compelling,
> but
> >> you
> >> > have to be all in on the entire Microsoft and Microsoft Partner stack.
> >> >
> >> > Hyperic was quite nice a few years ago, very good at monitoring
> services
> >> > and parts of services, focused mainly on Java apps, but it had a lot
> of
> >> > usefulness.
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Cialug mailing list
> >> > Cialug at cialug.org
> >> > http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Cialug mailing list
> >> Cialug at cialug.org
> >> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cialug mailing list
> > Cialug at cialug.org
> > http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Chapin
> President, CedarLug, retired
> President, UNIPC, "I'll get around to it"
> President, UNI Scuba Club
> Senator, NISG, retired
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>