[Cialug] VM Server

[Scott Yates]

Proxmox can spin up either KVM boxes or "container" based boxes run under
OpenVZ.  (As I understand it, OpenVZ is more lightweight but less
virtualized)

http://www.proxmox.com/proxmox-ve/features


On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 1:56 PM, David Champion <dchamp1337 at gmail.com>wrote:

> Are VM clients portable between ProxMox and KVM? Or once you go with
> ProxMox, are you locked into them?
>
> For my personal server, I don't really need the advanced features. I'm
> mostly looking for the ability to run multiple compartmentalized VM's on
> the same server, and to do snapshot style backups.
>
> I did install CentOS 6.5 to a USB flash drive yesterday, and got kvm and
> libvirt installed on it, still has plenty of space left on the 4gb flash
> drive, but I'll probably get a larger USB flash drive before I deploy it
> anyway.
>
> Here's a benchmark comparing KVM to Xen. Seems the KVM does have better
> performance.
>
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=intel_haswell_virtualization&num=1
>
> -dc
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Scott Yates <Scott at yatesframe.com> wrote:
>
> > Going to go ahead and put my 2c in for ProxMox.  It is VERY easy to set
> up
> > and run.  The web gui is clean and speedy, and you can still do the more
> > advanced operations like moving a live/running image from one machine to
> > another without even losing a ping.
> >
> > It's very nice stuff, free, and seems to be very solid.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Daniel A. Ramaley <
> > daniel.ramaley at drake.edu
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Personally i'd use XenServer. But that's because at work i administer
> > > several XenServer pools and so am quite familiar with it. The free
> > > version of XenServer 6.2 has almost full functionality (previous
> > > versions were artificially restricted to convince people to pay). The
> > > two things is lacks are that you can't apply patches using the console
> > > GUI (have to do that on the command line), and you can't call tech
> > > support and expect a useful response. (Which is *not* meant to imply
> > > that they will have a useful response even if you have a support
> > > contract.)
> > >
> > > I guess overall i'd have to say use what you are familiar with, unless
> > > what you are familiar with has deficiencies that bother you and you
> want
> > > to try something new. If you want to try something new, i suggest
> > > looking at XenServer.
> > >
> > > On 2014-01-18 at 12:54:49 David Champion wrote:
> > > > I'm planning to upgrade my co-located server, a good old Dell SC1425
> > > > I've been running for years, with a Dell PE2950, and run a Virtual
> > > > Machine server. The VM's will be running Linux.
> > > >
> > > > I'm quite familiar with VMWare. I've run VirtualBox on the desktop
> for
> > > > testing OS's, and I've just started playing around with KVM. Haven't
> > > > run Xen.
> > > >
> > > > Of all of these, I'm kind of leaning towards KVM at the moment. It
> > > > seems really easy to set up, and you can manage your vm's from the
> > > > command line, i.e. I can ssh in from my tablet and restart a VM if
> > > > something crashes.
> > > >
> > > > Anyone have any input on what they'd run for a VM Server?
> > > >
> > > > -dc
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Cialug mailing list
> > > > Cialug at cialug.org
> > > > http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
> > > __
> > > Daniel A. Ramaley
> > > Network Engineer 2
> > >
> > > Dial Center 112, Drake University
> > > 2407 Carpenter Ave / Des Moines IA 50311 USA
> > > Tel: +1 515 271-4540
> > > Fax: +1 515 271-1938
> > > E-mail: daniel.ramaley at drake.edu
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Cialug mailing list
> > > Cialug at cialug.org
> > > http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cialug mailing list
> > Cialug at cialug.org
> > http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>