[Cialug] Slightly OT, .. WiFi Latency
Josh More
jmore at starmind.org
Wed Aug 22 21:47:20 CDT 2012
Does the WAP have some sort of powersave setting, perhaps?
On Aug 22, 2012 9:26 PM, "L. V. Lammert" <lvl at omnitec.net> wrote:
> We normaly use cable connections for the industrial systems we install,
> which operate on a 'short transaction' type of traffic (a few hundred
> bytes at a time, with a variable amount of time in between)..
>
> Never had a problem in the past with latency with wire, but we just moved
> one installation and they are using WiFi temporarily until they can get
> cables run.
>
> Has anyone ever encountered what appears to be a 'connection setup'
> latency between wired and WiFi? In this case, the first 'transaction'
> seems to run slow [but complete properly], .. subsequent transactions are
> just fine; after a wait period, again, the first transaction is slow.
>
> The units have excellent signal strength, and are connecting at 54 Mbps,
> .. and, once a 'transaction' sequence is in process, response is
> excellent.
>
> It 'feels' to me like it takes longer to establish a connection over
> WiFi, .. some of the notes I find online indicate that is fact, but I
> don't see any explanation.
>
> Would anyone have any thoughts on why/justification/possible ways to fix?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Lee
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>
More information about the Cialug
mailing list