[Cialug] decreasing website latency

Kenneth Younger kyounger at gmail.com
Thu Nov 4 09:08:38 CDT 2010


On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Matthew Nuzum <newz at bearfruit.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Paul Gray <gray at cs.uni.edu> wrote:
>
>> On 11/04/2010 08:20 AM, Josh More wrote:
>> > I do not believe that wget is a good tool for testing SSL, as it will
>> > have to negotiate the keys every time it runs.  A browser should do it
>> > on the first hit and then store them for future hits so the entire
>> > session is reasonable.
>> >
>>
>> True, but you can use wget's "--no-check-certificate" option to bypass the
>> majority of the check.
>>
>
> Ah, thanks guys. I used "track resources" in Chrome and the latency is only
> 100ms. Using --no-check-certificate did speed up wget but put it at .379.
>
> Hmm... actually, now that I think about it, the use case for this site is
> as a web service. Testing in Chrome isn't really that important. I did test
> with curl and got similar results to wget --no-check-certificate.
>
> I can live with it, but am happy to hear any other tips. Because it's a web
> service I don't know if caching will help much.
>
> --
> Matthew Nuzum
> newz2000 on freenode, skype, linkedin, identi.ca and twitter
>
> "An investment in knowledge pays the best interest." -Benjamin Franklin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>
>
Can you throw Nginx or some other proxy in front to handle the SSL and then
just pass the request back to apache?

-- 
Kenneth Younger III
Founder, Sheer Focus Inc.
Organizer, WordCamp Iowa
e: kenny at sheerfocus.com
p: (515) 367-0001
t: @kenny <http://twitter.com/kenny>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://cialug.org/pipermail/cialug/attachments/20101104/9eb5fb46/attachment.htm 


More information about the Cialug mailing list