[Cialug] suggestions on HDD based backup
Dave Hala Jr
dave at 58ghz.net
Thu Apr 15 13:47:25 CDT 2010
I actually do this. I do a full nightly backup and mirror the backup
offsite.
:) Dave
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 18:27 +0000, Josh More wrote:
> And right here is the point of concern:
>
> "Explaining it now, it now seems like overkill to take the nightly
> backup off site since there will be a remote mirror of the data, but
> I'd rather be over-prepared than under-prepared."
>
> Yes, it is better to be over-prepared than under-prepared. However,
> by requiring the off-site component to be a movable hard drive, you
> are drastically limiting your options. If you split up the
> requirements:
>
> 1) Ability to restore to "point in time" where POT is a nightly backup
> stored for two weeks.
> 2) Ability to store backup sets offsite
>
> You can put in a backup server or NAS that stores multiple backup sets
> and then mirror these sets off site. If you like, you can also mirror
> these to a USB/SATA drive and pull that offsite occasionally... but
> the former alone would meet the criteria.
>
> It is worth noting that NO backup solution will be admin-free. You
> cannot rely on the system to notify you in case of failure, as a
> failure could also fail to send the notifications. The NAS issue
> mentioned earlier in this thread would have been resolved if someone
> had checked for success on a daily basis. Most other mirroring /
> backup set issues can be caught by spending 5m a day making sure it's
> working OK.
>
>
> -Josh More, CISSP, GIAC-GSLC, GIAC-GCIH, RHCE, NCLP
> morej at alliancetechnologies.net
> 515-245-7701
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> From: cialug-bounces at cialug.org [cialug-bounces at cialug.org] on behalf
> of Tim Champion [timchampion at gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 13:25
> To: Central Iowa Linux Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Cialug] suggestions on HDD based backup
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Eric Junker <eric at eric.nu> wrote:
> On 4/15/2010 11:27 AM, Tim Champion wrote:
> > We are planning on going to a hard drive based backup system
> at work. We
> > are a non-profit on a tight budget (I can spend about $1500
> on this
> > total), so a enterprise level disk-to-disk system isn't
> feasible. The
>
>
> How many computers are you backing up? How much storage space
> do you need?
>
> If you want something that works right out of the box I would
> suggest
> something like the Drobo FS http://www.drobo.com/ You do pay a
> premium
> for the ease of use. Instead of swapping drives for off-site
> backup you
> could use a network based backup like Mozy
> http://mstorageozy.com or manually
> backup to Amazon S3.
>
> If you want more of a traditional NAS device, I've heard good
> things
> about QNAP http://www.qnap.com/
>
>
> I've looked into many of the online backup services. Our total backup
> need right now is about 500GB, so the online services like mozy start
> getting really expensive. Mozy charges 50 cents per GB per month,
> which would be $250 per month. So, that pretty much rules that out.
>
> We are already planning to do a site-to-site data sync between
> Marshalltown & Ames, but that will be a live sync, and would not
> protect against accidental deletion. We've all heard the horror
> stories of places using mirroring or something like a live sync and
> then losing data anyway because they did not have a "real" backup. The
> piece I'm specifically looking at is the nightly backup so we have at
> least 2 weeks of history of our data. Explaining it now, it now seems
> like overkill to take the nightly backup off site since there will be
> a remote mirror of the data, but I'd rather be over-prepared than
> under-prepared.
>
> Tim Champion
> timchampion at gmail.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
More information about the Cialug
mailing list