[Cialug] Fast 486's and jumbo shrimp (was: Which Distro is best?)
Tim Wilson
tim_linux at wilson-home.com
Wed Jul 9 21:38:12 CDT 2008
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 5:06 PM, David Champion <dchampion at visionary.com>
wrote:
> Nathan Stien wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Daniel A. Ramaley <
>> daniel.ramaley at drake.edu <mailto:daniel.ramaley at drake.edu>> wrote:
>>
>> Wasn't the slowest 486 running at 25 MHz? 8 sounds a bit slow. How
>> fast
>> did Intel go with the 486? I know the 66 MHz version was quite popular
>> for awhile. I seem to (vaguely) remember some late-model 486's at 75
>> and 100 MHz. AMD made a 486 running at 133 MHz (i still have one
>> running in a cardboard box as my firewall). I don't know about any
>> faster than that though.
>>
>>
>> I find the idea of 133 MHz 486's amusing, mainly because my first pentium
>> ran at a blistering 60 MHz. ~1995, IIRC.
>>
> We had one of the first commercially available Pentiums - an AST P-90,
> which was a complete lemon. It seemed significantly slower than the
> 486-100's we were running at the time.
I don't know if it was accurate or not, but I heard that the Pentium had to
switch to compatibility mode to run "older" software. This switch made the
processor slower than 486 processors of the day.
Last fall I took the case for that one out and shot it full of holes at the
> shooting range. I can't tell you how satisfying it was to put a couple of
> .50 BMG holes through that box.
>
> My first PC I purpose-built had an AMD 486-100, which was pretty much the
> fastest processor I could get at the time. It was a pretty good machine
> (despite the SiS chipset), lasted me 3 or 4 years as a workstation, then
> another couple of years as a server.
IIRC, the AMD 486-100 was slower (as in throughput) than the Intel 486
DX4-100.
>
> -dc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>
--
Tim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://cialug.org/pipermail/cialug/attachments/20080709/4a4c494c/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Cialug
mailing list