[Cialug] Re: SuSE upgrades
Michael Watson
watsonm011 at hawaii.rr.com
Sat Oct 13 23:15:43 CDT 2007
Good on ya. I hope 10.{2,3} is as stable as 9.3 was for the past
two-plus years.
M.
Carl Olsen wrote:
> I just did the update from SUSE 9.3 to SUSE 10.2 on my web server. The Mono
> stuff broke, but everything else works just fine. I only have two web sites
> on the server and they are both working perfectly (PHP 5 and MySQL 5), so
> the update was successful as far as I'm concerned. The stuff the broke was
> just stuff I was playing around with, so nothing important got broken. I'll
> do the update to SUSE 10.3 one of these days.
>
> Carl
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Watson [mailto:watsonm011 at hawaii.rr.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 6:45 PM
> To: cialug at cialug.org
> Cc: carl-olsen at mchsi.com
> Subject: SuSE upgrades
>
> Just did a 9.3 to 10.2 upgrade on two different PCs (and a 10.2 -> 10.3
> on my laptop last night). Worked OK for the x86 PC, but not on the
> x86_64, the install errors with a specific message that it can't do 9.3
> to 10.2 x86_64. So I did a full install on that one. I don't imagine
> 9.3 -> 10.3 should be much different...
>
> Except you may want to note that 10.3 changes the first disk from
> /dev/hda to /dev/sda. The release notes say you can inhibit this by
> adding 'hwprobe=-modules.pata' (or similar) to the kernel parameters,
> but I didn't see this until after the upgrade was done, and my fstab had
> already been updated. Not a problem on the laptop (my testbed as well
> as travel computer), but I've got an IDE/SATA mix on my main PC, and
> this should make that an interesting upgrade. I need to research if
> this can/should be done on the command line on the DVD install boot,
> and/or added to the GRUB parameters, or what (like maybe it assumes no
> IDE drives at all?) Maybe a post-upgrade fstab fix is the simplest path.
>
> HTH,
> Michael
>
> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:31:31 +0000
> From: carl-olsen at mchsi.com
> <http://us.f301.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=carl-olsen@mchsi.com&YY=29437&y
> 5beta=yes&ymv=0&y5beta=yes&order=up&sort=date&pos=0&view=a>
> Subject: [Cialug] SUSE 9.3
> To: Central Iowa Linux Users Group <cialug at cialug.org
> <http://us.f301.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=cialug@cialug.org&YY=29437&y5be
> ta=yes&ymv=0&y5beta=yes&order=up&sort=date&pos=0&view=a>>
> Message-ID:
>
>
> <101220071731.26299.470FAF73000B799C000066BB219791280203010CD2079C080C03BF02
> 0A9C0401D3049D0E0C at mchsi.com
> <http://us.f301.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=101220071731.26299.470FAF73000B
> 799C000066BB219791280203010CD2079C080C03BF020A9C0401D3049D0E0C at mchsi.com&YY=
> 29437&y5beta=yes&ymv=0&y5beta=yes&order=up&sort=date&pos=0&view=a>>
>
>
> I did an update from SUSE 10.2 to SUSE 10.3 last night. Last week, I
> did the
> update from SUSE 10.1 to SUSE 10.2. This seems to be fairly easy.
>
> I'm wondering if I can do an update from SUSE 9.3 to SUSE 10.3 and have
> it work
> just as easy.
>
> Does anyone know if I can update directly to SUSE 10.3 from SUSE 9.3
> without
> doing each version update one at a time?
>
> Carl Olsen
> Des Moines
>
>
More information about the Cialug
mailing list