[Cialug] Do we still need LUGs?

[David Bierce]

Which reminds me.

The Holy Grail is under D101, incase you were wondering.  :)


On Jul 23, 2007, at 2:35 PM, Tim Wilson wrote:

> It varies from meeting to meeting.  Last Wednesday's meeting saw  
> about 10 people, but some of the "usual" people (I can't use the  
> word normal for this group :-) ) chose to go see Spam-A-Lot  
> instead, so the crowd was smaller.  I'd say on average we've seen  
> about 20 people at a meeting.
>
> On 7/23/07, Daniel A. Ramaley <daniel.ramaley at drake.edu> wrote:
> How many people typically make it to the CIALUG meetings these  
> days? It
> has been a few years since i've attended one; there'd probably be a  
> few
> faces unfamiliar to me if i were to.
>
> On Monday 23 July 2007 12:40, john doe wrote:
> >While the author is focusing on LUGs, I think it goes a lot further
> > than that.  Of the 5-6 <fill-in-subject-matter-here> good-sized user
> > groups I was associated with in the Twin Cities throughout the 90's,
> > only one--the SAGE group--shows signs of life.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> --
> Dan Ramaley                            Dial Center 118, Drake  
> University
> Network Programmer/Analyst             2407 Carpenter Ave
> +1 515 271-4540                        Des Moines IA 50311 USA
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>
>
>
> -- 
> Tim
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://cialug.org/pipermail/cialug/attachments/20070723/3b20eac3/attachment.html