[Cialug] CentOS

[David Champion]

How would you compare running RH vs Fedora vs CentOS?

My recent experiences with RH haven't been too favorable. It seems that 
things are more difficult to accomplish, and it doesn't have the depth 
of applications and modules available as say Mandriva or Debian. IIRC, 
it was a pain to get the php ms-sql module for RH, for instance, but 
it's in the main distribution for Mandriva. I used to be a heavy RH 
user, from about 4.0 to 6.2, but moved off it after that.

Anyone following the universal package management front? i.e. 
http://autopackage.org/

-dc

Nathan C. Smith wrote:
> Centos is great.  And they have a real organization built up around it now
> so that is nice too.  I prefer Ubuntu now, but if you need RHEL
> compatibility, it is a great way to go.  Sometimes they are even patching
> before Redhat.
> 
> -Nate
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tony Jeffries [mailto:ajeffri at loopysite.org] 
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 12:15 PM
>> To: cialug at cialug.org
>> Cc: amesfug at amesfug.org
>> Subject: [Cialug] CentOS
>>
>>
>> CIALUG and AmesFUG,
>>
>> I was wondering if there are any CentOS users around? If so, 
>> I'd like to know what you think about it. Thanks!
>>
>> -- 
>> Tony Jeffries
>> ajeffri at loopysite.org
>> n0nro at arrl.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cialug mailing list
>> Cialug at cialug.org
>> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>