[Cialug] wireless PCI adapter

[Matthew Johnson]

By going the PCMCIA to PCI adapter route, I'm guessing the potential for
poor reception (due to the case) will still exist.  correct?
Matthew

>>> dave at visionary.com 9/12/05 9:45:54 AM >>>
I talked to Matt a little about this at the SFD event, then later to
Tom 
  Pohl and others.

Matt didn't want to use USB because he didn't know if he had a free USB

port on all machines, and was concerned that they might be USB 1.0.

Tom and I both have had similar experiences with PCI cards - that they

don't get very good reception because the antenna is potentially
blocked 
by your PC case.

One nice thing about the USB adapters is you can put them on an 
extension cable (some of them come with a cable and even a nifty stand)

then orient it for the best reception.

Tom also mentioned that you can get a PCI to PCMCIA adapter, then plug

in the PCMCIA card of your choice. Of course, this will add to your
cost.

-dc

Dave J. Hala Jr. wrote:
> I'm curious, why did you choose to avoid the USB adapters?
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 09:07, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> 
>>Hello All,
>>I would like to set up a home wireless network, and
>>was hoping for recommendations regarding a Linux
>>compatible PCI wireless card for a desktop machine.
>>prism54.org only lists one card, there has to be
>>others...? Just to complicate the situation further,
>>802.11g is the goal, along with avoiding the USB
>>attached adapters. Thank you for any suggestions.
>>
>>Matthew
>>
>>__________________________________________________
>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
>>http://mail.yahoo.com 
>>_______________________________________________
>>Cialug mailing list
>>Cialug at cialug.org 
>>http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug 


_______________________________________________
Cialug mailing list
Cialug at cialug.org 
http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug