[Cialug] ipcop
Allen Kiddoo
cialug@cialug.org
Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:37:18 -0600
AND-
Since Eve was a spinoff of Adam, there
must be something wrong with Adam?
Allen
---------- Original Message -----------
From: Claus <cniesen@gmx.net>
To: cialug@cialug.org
Sent: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 08:54:01 -0600
Subject: Re: [Cialug] ipcop
> > IPCop is similar because it is a direct fork of smoothwall, which would
> > imply that there was/is something wrong with the smoothwall project. I
> > would like to stress the importance of looking into the history of
> > Smoothwall before supporting them.
>
> Wow, harsh statement. "OpenBSD is similar because it is a direct
> fork of NetBSD, which would imply that there was/is something wrong
> with the NetBSD project." While some OpenBSD people do agree with
> that I don't think that statement is appropriate. I read the same
> out of the IPCop/Smoothwall statement. This game can be played with
> many other forks. No reason was given why Smoothwall has/had
> something wrong with it. In fact it sounds like the poster doesn't
> know much about Smoothwall, just like me - I don't know either
> software. With that the statement above not only has no value but
> it's also misleading.
>
> Claus
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug@cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
------- End of Original Message -------