[Cialug] OT: Wireless protocols
Neal Daringer
admin at c0wzftp.com
Wed Jun 15 20:56:10 CDT 2005
i use g and tweaked wireless switches/routers. give em a bit higher Tx
power and
a damn good antenna. i've heard that g routers can do the up-coming
wireless "n"
protocol (i think thats what its called). anyone know anything about the new
wireless protocol?
Quoting Tom Pohl <tom at tcpconsulting.com>:
> The choice for me is simple. In the same family of products, B has
> always tested with greater range than G products. Even at the
> slowest connection, B connected at 1Mb/s (the other rates are 2.5, 5,
> and 11). Since I aim for an access point density that will give a
> minimum connection of 5Mb/s I don't really see a problem with using B
> equipment since the broadband coming into the location tends to
> always be 1Mb or less, if all of the traffic is destined for the
> internet, B or G really makes no difference.
>
> I got a phone call in the middle of that so sorry if it doesn't make
> much sense.
>
> -Tom
>
>
> On Jun 15, 2005, at 3:49 PM, Nathan C. Smith wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Does anybody out there care whether they use 802.11g or 802.11b? I would
>> normally pick 'b' because it is the lowest common denominator. Is it no
>> longer true that using an 802.11b device will ratchet down everyone's speed
>> on an 802.11g access point? What are the wireless hotspot operators using?
>> Do they cater to 'g' and 'b'?
>>
>> -Nate
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cialug mailing list
>> Cialug at cialug.org
>> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
More information about the Cialug
mailing list