[Cialug] best supported/performing Ethernet adapter?
Theron Conrey
theron at conrey.org
Sun Jun 12 00:50:55 CDT 2005
That always seems to be the driver in any of the servers I've built.
Works well. This is a realtek card, was wary at first but debian picked
it right up no issues. I'll second that bit about the linksys cards
however.......
Theron
Jonathan Bailey wrote:
>I've done pretty well with the Intel (e100 driver) cards/onboard.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cialug-bounces at cialug.org [mailto:cialug-bounces at cialug.org] On Behalf
>Of Dan Hockey
>Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 10:36 PM
>To: Central Iowa Linux Users Group
>Subject: Re: [Cialug] best supported/performing Ethernet adapter?
>
>Nathan C. Smith wrote:
>
>
>
>>I think it is a true statement that not all Ethernet cards and their
>>drivers are equal. My sense is that the inexpensive realtek and VINE
>>chips/cards depend more on well-written drivers than intelligence built
>>into the chips/cards. Can anyone recommend a well-performing 100
>>megabit card with good Linux support? Are 3Com and Intel cards good
>>
>>
>choices?
>
>
>>-Nate
>>_______________________________________________
>>Cialug mailing list
>>Cialug at cialug.org
>>http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>3com is the only nic I've used and haven't had any problems in linux.
>Linksys will work but it took a little work to find the right driver. so far
>those are the brands I've used.
>-dh
>
>_______________________________________________
>Cialug mailing list
>Cialug at cialug.org
>http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>
>_______________________________________________
>Cialug mailing list
>Cialug at cialug.org
>http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>
>
>
More information about the Cialug
mailing list