[Cialug] Apple and Intel
Tony Bibbs
tony at tonybibbs.com
Wed Jun 8 10:35:23 CDT 2005
I disagree. I'm still longing for an OS that has then flexibility of
linux with the sort of driver support found in windows.. OSX is quickly
becoming the middle ground.
I'm guessing quite a few on this list would agree given all the Mac
laptops I saw at the last (and only) LUG meeting I attended this year.
Beside, a proprietary OS that can give me a real terminal window can't
be all that bad, can it?
--Tony
Theron Conrey wrote:
> From a hardware perspective it's pretty interesting stuff but,
> no matter what happens the situation remains the same.
> OSX still isn't free, so the impact (hoepfully) will be minimal at best.
>
> Theron
>
>
>
> D. Joe Anderson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:35:02PM -0500, Bryan Baker wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jun 7, 2005, at 10:29 PM, Nathan C. Smith wrote:
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>> So here's a stupid question - what kind of thing will keep me
>>>>
>>>> from buying Mac OS and slapping it on any Intel box? I
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> thought all the stuff that used to be in ROM no longer was. What
>>>> will distinguish an Apple from any other machine?
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> I'm betting they will have a hand at least in the mobo design, they
>>> do a bunch of their own ASICs, etc. and they have been using
>>> OpenFirmware - not BIOS, but that may change now, but I bet there'll
>>> be other diff's - that said I give it a couple weeks before someone
>>> comes out w/ a hack, but you can bet it won't get support.
>>>
>>
>>
>> That, and what this guy said (after you skip down past all the
>> license flamewar cruft) in
>>
>> http://zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/2005-June/011207.html
>>
>> Mac OS X's demographic is precisely the opposite of those
>> with enough technical skill to hack and/or patch enough of
>> their operating system to make it run on non-Apple hardware.
>> Even if someone managed to make that work, and found a way
>> to hack in driver support, either through some Rube Goldberg
>> linux-driver-wrapper horseshit or other, it wouldn't be
>> terribly useful to terribly many people who leave their
>> basement on a regular basis.
>>
>> The "not [...] terribly many people" who would be interested in
>> doing this are pretty much the Mac fans who inhabit Linux and
>> other free OS mailing lists like this one--a minority of a
>> minority. Heck, I figure I probably know the majority of these
>> people who live in Iowa ;-)
>>
>> ie, not enough to affect their market significantly.
>>
>> outside of this, the Mac customers are either going to be the
>> ricer-wannabees who might think the hack is cool, but who don't
>> have the time/skill/whatever to actually apply it, and the
>> people like the ones Valentine mentions above, who want their
>> sealed-box to Just Work, they don't care how, and you can't make
>> them care.
>> The main thing is that someone who does care, and who does have
>> the skill to apply the hacks isn't going to be able to hang out
>> a shingle and go into business selling beige boxes that have
>> been Macified. The Clone Wars have already been fought, we know
>> how that turned out, and that was before the DMCA.
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
More information about the Cialug
mailing list