[Cialug] Apple and Intel

[John.Lengeling at radisys.com]

FYI, way back when...circa 1987 Microsoft had a version of MS-Word 
(version 2 or something) which ran under UNIX.

I purchased it for an AT&T 3B2 computer running SYSV for word processing 
in the admissions department at a university.

johnl




"Nathan C. Smith" <smith at ipmvs.com> 
Sent by: cialug-bounces at cialug.org
06/08/2005 09:34 AM
Please respond to
Central Iowa Linux Users Group <cialug at cialug.org>


To
'Central Iowa Linux Users Group' <cialug at cialug.org>
cc

Subject
RE: [Cialug] Apple and Intel







Here is one more stupid question and then I'm done with the Apple-Intel
thing.

OK, so Apple Builds Mac OS 10 for Intel, applications are compiled to run
universally on PPC and Intel.  That means the next build of Microsoft 
Office
is basically running on Unix on Intel.  How big of a jump is it then to 
have
Microsoft Office running on another *nix?  The pretty face on OS X is
proprietary yes?  How hard is it to duplicate or emulate, are there 
already
project to do it?  Could MS license the relevant portions just for their
applications running on *nix?

If I take off my tinfoil hat for a minute it almost looks like Apple is
giving Microsoft inroads to putting their cash cow on *nix.

-Nate

-----Original Message-----
From: Nathan C. Smith 
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 10:30 PM
To: 'Central Iowa Linux Users Group'
Subject: RE: [Cialug] Apple and Intel




So here's a stupid question - what kind of thing will keep me from buying
Mac OS and slapping it on any Intel box?  I thought all the stuff that 
used
to be in ROM no longer was.  What will distinguish an Apple from any other
machine?

-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Baker [mailto:ka_klick at mac.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 10:26 PM
To: Central Iowa Linux Users Group
Subject: Re: [Cialug] Apple and Intel



Me.
I'd rather see them using the better of the x86/64's but I think 2 
factors kept that from happening: 1. AMD probably can't supply the 
volume Apple projects. 2. AMD isn't the kickback machine that Intel is.

I'm betting they talked though.

On Jun 7, 2005, at 10:18 PM, Nathan C. Smith wrote:
> Anyone else wish Apple had partnered with AMD instead of Intel?
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>

--
Bryan Baker
President
Des Moines Macintosh Users Group
http://www.dmmug.org
president at dmmug.org

_______________________________________________
Cialug mailing list
Cialug at cialug.org
http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
_______________________________________________
Cialug mailing list
Cialug at cialug.org
http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
_______________________________________________
Cialug mailing list
Cialug at cialug.org
http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://cialug.org/pipermail/cialug/attachments/20050608/f78a58d8/attachment.htm