[Cialug] Mediacom speed bump

[frankie]

It would be if you could get a static IP. And they got rid of the  
script kiddies. :P


Irv Robison
IRVNET
515-720-7816
frankie at raccoon.com
www.irvnet.us

Optimism and perserverance have gotten me farther than anything else  
I have tried.

"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.  
If you
are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the  
addressee, you
must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this  
message or
any information herein. If you have received this message in error,  
please
advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this  
message. Thank
you for your cooperation."


On Jul 15, 2005, at 10:41 AM, Nathan C. Smith wrote:

>
>
> Now that's broadband the way it was meant to be.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bailey, Jonathan C [mailto:bailj0 at bp.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 10:27 AM
> To: Central Iowa Linux Users Group
> Subject: RE: [Cialug] Mediacom speed bump
>
>
>
> I must say that I'm happy with my 6mbit/768kbit with Comcast here  
> in IL
> :-D   They don't seem to have any of the major outages that Mediacom
> does...
>
>
>
> Jon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cialug-bounces at cialug.org [mailto:cialug-bounces at cialug.org]  
> On Behalf
> Of n.d
> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 10:25 AM
> To: Central Iowa Linux Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Cialug] Mediacom speed bump
>
> hey jerry any word on the 10:1 package thats going around the bbr  
> forums?
>
> Jerry Weida wrote:
>
>
>> All of the Mediacom residential customers should be set to 256K  
>> up/ 5M
>>
>
>
>> down.  If not, then you can try to reset your modem so it picks up  
>> the
>>
>
>
>> new config.
>>
>> On 7/15/05, *Don Cady* <donc5 at mchsi.com <mailto:donc5 at mchsi.com>>
>>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>     Anyone else notice Mediacom testing out their higher bandwidth
>>     level lately?
>>     I pulled down isos at about 550-575kB last night. Unfortunately
>>     this was not
>>     home (got home & it was normal), so I don't have a good basis for
>>     comparison.
>>
>>     Don
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Cialug mailing list
>>     Cialug at cialug.org <mailto:Cialug at cialug.org>
>>     http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> --
>> -
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cialug mailing list
>> Cialug at cialug.org
>> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://cialug.org/pipermail/cialug/attachments/20050715/91e997e3/attachment-0001.html