[Cialug] raid/nas

[n.d]

well its going to go over the network obviously(1gbps). i'd like to use 
as much of that as possible.  then capacity, and last reliability. i'm 
wanting the raid to help with the reliability part.


Nathan C. Smith wrote:

>Are you after performance, capacity or reliability?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: n.d [mailto:admin at c0wzftp.com] 
>Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 10:23 PM
>To: Central Iowa Linux Users Group
>Subject: Re: [Cialug] raid/nas
>
>
>this is what i'm seeing yes. 3ware looks good.
>
>i'm also thinking raid5 is the way i'm going to want to go.
>
>Nathan C. Smith wrote:
>
>  
>
>>You must use 3ware.  Very good.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: n.d [mailto:admin at c0wzftp.com]
>>Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 9:48 PM
>>To: cialug at cialug.org
>>Subject: [Cialug] raid/nas
>>
>>
>>anyone know some good raid controllers that work excellent in linux? 
>>i'm
>>thinking serial ata before ide or eide. no scsi plz
>>
>>i've never used raid before.  i'm looking to make a fileserver with
>>~100-150tb of storage. also like to have some expandibility in the future.
>>
>>NAS anyone?
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>


-- 
Get Thunderbird <http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/>