[Cialug] DNS Issues
n.d
admin at c0wzftp.com
Tue Aug 23 19:15:50 CDT 2005
i got that crazy 169 stuff to. (fedora core 4)
[root at datastor ~]# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
ajeffri at loopysite.org wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 07:04:30PM -0500, Stuart Thiessen wrote:
>
>
>>I do not have any network on 169.254.0.0. Could it be that all of my
>>traffic is going to 169.254.0.0? Would that be able to find the
>>gateway? If 169.254.0.0 is representing my alias address, then I am
>>confused because I did set the alias address with an address local to
>>the 192.168.0.0 network. I can ping it and such with the designated
>>192.168.0.xxx address.
>>
>>
>
>169.254.0.0/16 is the address range that Windows uses when it can't find an address
>via DHCP. I don't know what it's doing in your Linux routing table, however.
>Maybe it's a case of the distro trying to be helpful.
>
>I just ran route -n on a box of mine that has aliases, and they don't show
>up there. They will always show up in the output of ifconfig -a as something
>like eth0:0 for the first alias, eth0:1 for the second, etc. and the real
>interface as eth0.
>
>
>
More information about the Cialug
mailing list