[Cialug] Freese Notis has VOIP
Neal Daringer
cialug@cialug.org
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:30:08 -0500
neither is it realistic to think that congressmen and women can agree on
anything, but that seems to work for everyone now doesn't it. ;)
Quoting Jon Clemons <clemdog@marshallnet.com>:
> Yes, although it would be extremely difficult to get servers
> in every local calling area due to cost. Or if say several ISP's
> cooperated then it would make it more feasible although
> getting that many ISP's to cooperate is not very likely either.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Neal Daringer" <admin@c0wzftp.com>
> To: <cialug@cialug.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 4:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [Cialug] Freese Notis has VOIP
>
>
>> ah. so the way to get around this would be to have servers in every local
>> calling area and have them automagically route calls so they are
>> going to those
>> local calling areas? i think i've heard of a service that works like
>> this before
>> but can't quite put my finger on it. its kinda like a peer2peer
>> phone network?
>> would that be an accurate way of thinking of it?
>>
>> Quoting Jon Clemons <clemdog@marshallnet.com>:
>>
>>> VOIP is. But the issue is if the call is not VOIP to VOIP
>>> then it has to hit the PSTN somewhere and that
>>> call then is subject to per minute long distance charges
>>> which vary depending on who your getting those services
>>> from and how good your rate is.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Neal Daringer" <admin@c0wzftp.com>
>>> To: <cialug@cialug.org>
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 3:46 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Cialug] Freese Notis has VOIP
>>>
>>>
>>>> i thought voIP was unregulated and therefore didn't have tariffs?
>>>>
>>>> Quoting Jon Clemons <clemdog@marshallnet.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> I would say their pricing point seems a bit high considering this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Long distance interstate calls will be billed at 4.9 cents per
>>>>> minute. Intrastate calls can vary depending upon where you call,
>>>>> in some cases 10 cents per minute or more depending on local
>>>>> tariff charges.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nathan C. Smith" <smith@ipmvs.com>
>>>>> To: <cialug@cialug.org>
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 3:18 PM
>>>>> Subject: [Cialug] Freese Notis has VOIP
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just got off the phone with Tony at Freese and they are
>>>>>> getting into VOIP
>>>>>> in a big way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'http://www.iowatalk.com/'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They are also terminating 515 numbers at this time.
>>>>>> It would seem that they have already nailed the price point too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Nate
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nathan Smith McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. 515.288.3667
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Cialug mailing list
>>>>>> Cialug@cialug.org
>>>>>> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Cialug mailing list
>>>>> Cialug@cialug.org
>>>>> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Cialug mailing list
>>>> Cialug@cialug.org
>>>> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Cialug mailing list
>>> Cialug@cialug.org
>>> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cialug mailing list
>> Cialug@cialug.org
>> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug@cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.