<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Zachary Kotlarek <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:zach@kotlarek.com">zach@kotlarek.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
On Feb 22, 2011, at 4:52 PM, Tim Wilson wrote:<br>
<br>
> Just because you can print two copies doesn't mean everyone would. Someone could easily print one copy, make a change in the system, then print a second one. Unless every party had access to all copies, no one would be the wiser. Most would do as you say, but there is always a troublemaker in a group.<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>I'm just saying carbon copies don't add any security to that process. You could still go back and print a second copy later with different data no matter what type of paper was in use.<br>
<br></blockquote></div><div><br></div>I think it comes to a matter of trust. Some people feel like they can trust multi-part forms. In some cases, the illusion of security is as important as real security. Like those dummy blinking lights you can buy for your car that makes people think you have an alarm.<br clear="all">
<br>-- <br>Matthew Nuzum<br>newz2000 on freenode, skype, linkedin, <a href="http://identi.ca" target="_blank">identi.ca</a> and twitter<br><br>"An investment in knowledge pays the best interest." -Benjamin Franklin <br>
<br>