<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_network_monitoring_systems">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_network_monitoring_systems</a><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Tom Pohl <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tom@tcpconsulting.com">tom@tcpconsulting.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Has anyone followed the fork from Nagios to Icinga? Any benefits or drawbacks from the switch?<br>
<br>
Thanks!<br>
<font color="#888888">-Tom<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On Aug 30, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Christopher R. Rhodes wrote:<br>
<br>
> On 08/30/10 12:54, L. V. Lammert wrote:<br>
>> Doing a clean slate design replacing Big Brother for monitoring about 75<br>
>> bunch of remote backup servers, .. has anyone seen a decent feature<br>
>> comparison published anywhere?<br>
>><br>
>> Lee<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> While you are looking, consider this one: <a href="https://labs.omniti.com/labs/reconnoiter" target="_blank">https://labs.omniti.com/labs/reconnoiter</a><br>
><br>
> Theo's done a spectacular job with it.<br>
><br>
><br>
> I'll +1 both nagios and opennms. I have used and loved them both though am currently more aligned with Nagios.<br>
><br>
><br>
> crr<br>
> <a href="mailto:arreyder@apache.org">arreyder@apache.org</a><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Cialug mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Cialug@cialug.org">Cialug@cialug.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug" target="_blank">http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Cialug mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Cialug@cialug.org">Cialug@cialug.org</a><br>
<a href="http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug" target="_blank">http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>-Joseph<br>cell 858-337-9922<br>