Well, the theory's sound perhaps for 802.11n packets going straight up...but...then....<mind boggled><br><br>--DONE<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:45 AM, James Shoemaker <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:james@dhlake.com">james@dhlake.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">Tim Wilson wrote:<br>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Josh More<br>
> <<a href="mailto:morej@alliancetechnologies.net">morej@alliancetechnologies.net</a>>wrote:<br>
><br>
>> CAT5 uses twisted pair to prevent the weight issues. WiFi can't.<br>
>><br>
><br>
> Hmm, the reasoning that I heard was different:<br>
> 1. The faster you go, the quicker you'll escape Earth's gravity.<br>
> 2. When you escape Earth's gravity, you'll be weightless.<br>
><br>
> Therefore, the faster things go, the more weightless they become. Since<br>
> packets travel faster on wires, the packets actually became weightless.<br>
> Since wireless is slower, the packets aren't weightless.<br>
<br>
</div> Doesn't that violate special relativity that theorizes that the<br>
faster you go the heavier you get?<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
James<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Cialug mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Cialug@cialug.org">Cialug@cialug.org</a><br>
<a href="http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug" target="_blank">http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>