On 10/12/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Mark Hesseltine</b> <<a href="mailto:markhesseltine@gmail.com">markhesseltine@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On 10/12/07, Josh More <<a href="mailto:morej@alliancetechnologies.net">morej@alliancetechnologies.net</a>> wrote:<br>> Congratulations.<br>><br>> However, looking at <a href="http://baby.pohl-family.net">http://baby.pohl-family.net
</a> , I caution you not to<br>> name him "Baby". Sure, it works fine for now, but should you wind up<br>> with another child, you have to either rename your first one (and deal<br>> with the legacy DNS issues) or name the new child "Little Baby"
<br>> (baby.little) to maintain consistency.<br><br>At worst, you'd just have to name the next ones baby1, baby2, etc. and<br>use round-robin load balancing with them.<br></blockquote></div><br>Yes, this happened to me (except the round-robin part). First child, a boy, was "Baby." Now, second child is "Baby girl." If there should ever come a third child and it was a girl, there'd need to be an additional qualifier added, maybe "Darling baby girl" or similar.
<br><br>It's best to start out with future expansion in mind.<br><br>CNGRTS.TOM<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Matthew Nuzum<br>newz2000 on freenode