Does anyone know why GIT is 'better' for merging than CVS/Subversion? Does it have to do with the performance of merging two branches multiple times over time?<br><br>Chris<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 6/7/07,
<b class="gmail_sendername">Jeffrey C. Ollie</b> <<a href="mailto:jeff@ocjtech.us">jeff@ocjtech.us</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 11:25 -0500, David Bierce wrote:<br>><br>> Last night I watched Linus give his google talk on version control.<br>> Has anyone played around with GIT? Or used GIT with Subversion?<br>><br>
> I'm Ugly and Stupid and use subversion, but distributed versioning<br>> sounds like it has quite a few benefits for distributed projects.<br><br>I've been using it quite a bit the last few weeks, and it rocks!
<br><br>Jeff<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Cialug mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Cialug@cialug.org">Cialug@cialug.org</a><br><a href="http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug">http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
</a><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>