I doubt they're going after any projects. In everything I've read from Balmer he's not once used the word patient or copyright, it's always "IP". I think we're just talking about FUD threats. The problem is that Novell has lent those threats credibility by making this deal.
<br><br>-G<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 11/17/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Tony Jeffries</b> <<a href="mailto:ajeffri@loopysite.org">ajeffri@loopysite.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Fri, November 17, 2006 10:24, <a href="mailto:Daniel.Juliano@wellsfargo.com">Daniel.Juliano@wellsfargo.com</a> wrote:<br><snip><br>> My concern is Microsoft might never attack property in The Kernel (tm),<br>> as wayyy too many companies are involved in it's development, but it
<br>> would be relatively easy to attack some of the key applications that<br>> make running linux worthwhile.<br><br>My thought is that, as someone else said, they're going after Samba, or<br>that they're going after OpenOffice.
<br><br>Those are the two I'm concerned about.<br><br>--<br>Tony Jeffries<br><a href="mailto:ajeffri@loopysite.org">ajeffri@loopysite.org</a><br><a href="mailto:n0nro@arrl.net">n0nro@arrl.net</a><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>Cialug mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Cialug@cialug.org">Cialug@cialug.org</a><br><a href="http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug">http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug</a><br></blockquote></div><br>